[MG] Crowdsourcing the History of eDemocracy
Pablo Segundo Garcia
pablo2garcia at gmail.com
Wed May 15 15:41:19 EDT 2013
Very interesting historical listing. I would like to link it in the
wiki of Partido de Internet and e2d-international. Could you post a
stable link for that? or shall we copy the list at some point to some
I would also point to agoravoting.com, and partidodeinternet.es
I guess you have seen this other listing on softwares:
At some point we could use this documentation for some nice pages in
the wikipedia which I find a little bit lacking of.
2013/5/15 Pietro Speroni di Fenizio <metagovernment at pietrosperoni.it>:
> Hi Michael,
> thanks for the thorough post.
> Very useful. I will heavily refer to it,
> and add it in the bibliography.
> Best Regards,
> Dr. Pietro Speroni di Fenizio,
> Home Page: http://www.pietrosperoni.it
> Mobile (Italy): +39 (345) 4542069
> Home Address:
> Pietro Speroni di Fenizio
> Sitio Curcodia, Ribas,
> Vila Nova de Poiares
> 3350-099 Portugal
> On 15 May 2013 13:36, Michael Allan <mike at zelea.com> wrote:
>> Pietro and Ed,
>> Pietro asked:
>> > > In particular can someone trace back the exact author and the date
>> > > of the idea that voting should not be linked with a specific
>> > > platform? Although this intuition has not yet reached full
>> > > maturation I think it deserves a place as one of the ideas that
>> > > might come up in the future.
>> Ed answered:
>> > > I believe Thomas von der Elbe came up with free range voting:
>> > > Michael can confirm and give a date.
>> Mark Murphy speaks of aggregation in his 2008 essay . That same
>> year he wrote in an email, "Anybody can cast their vote on the issue,
>> again by publishing a POSH-enhanced Web page."  He seems to have
>> wanted the votes to be free of central servers and instead in the
>> hands of self-publishing voters. That's a beautiful idea. The
>> servers become just aggregators, or what today I'd call "vote mirrors"
>> - except they're tied to a single standard for the vote form .
>> That's one problem. Another is that few people would actually be
>> inclined to host their own votes, most would instead come to rely on
>> vote-servers. So it's impractical as envisioned.
>> Thomas's first post to Metagov (May 2009) takes a different approach.
>> He's trying to get the vote-servers that already exist and already
>> host votes to cooperate . At one point in the thread, I suggest
>> vote pooling . But pooling embraces centralization, which is the
>> opposite of putting the vote in the voter's hands; it's unattractive.
>> The key to the problem turns out to be translation across vote forms.
>> That's the basis of vote mirroring, which Thomas invented in December
>> 2009 . It effectively puts the *form* of the vote in the voter's
>> hands because he/she can now choose any vote-server or voting method,
>> including (if need be) his/her own.
>> So Murphy was the first to go chasing after platform freedom (that I
>> know of), but Thomas was the first to actually catch it.
>> Pietro asked:
>> > What were the differences between Votorola and Candiwi?
>> Both support distributed drafting based on diff/patch tools. The main
>> differences are probably in the voting and discussion media. But I
>> don't remember Candiwi's design for those.
>> > I know Votorola has a nice tree structure of changes to a page. Has
>> > this been implemented or it is only theorethical (i.e. should I put
>> > it down as theorethical result)
>> What we have are tree structures of *extant* differences, as opposed
>> to historical changes. For example, here's Frank's draft:
>> Here's the current difference vs. his voter Georgina:
>> And here's the social tree structure that relates Georgina and Frank:
>> That's not a realistic example, of course, and not very instructive.
>> The practice docs indexed on the home page are more instructive:
>> > Then Free Range Voting (this was how it was called), Michael starts
>> > speaking about it on the 22/12/2009.
>> > Now what is its relation with Votorola?
>> Free-range voting is the primary use case for vote mirroring. It's
>> shown here: (see FRV) http://zelea.com/project/outcast/_overview.xht
>> The three vote-servers in that cluster (V) are supplied by different
>> providers. Users may freely range from server to server (vote form to
>> vote form); they can never be captured by a dominant provider, even
>> one that had 99.9% of the users. The relation with Votorola is that
>> we might be one of the providers. That would be unlikely without vote
>> mirroring, because it would be a dog-eat-dog race to the bottom.
>>  Mark Murphy. 2008. The “killer app” of public participation. In
>> Rebooting America. Edited by Allison Fine, Micah L. Sifrey, Andrew
>> Rasiej and Joshua Levy. Personal Democracy
>> Press. http://rebooting.personaldemocracy.com/node/5499
>>  Mark Murphy. 2007. xDebate formats specification, version
>> 0.1. Not published.
>> It's a Semantic HTML (POSH) schemata for federated debate on
>> political issues.
>>  http://zelea.com/w/User:ThomasvonderElbe_GmxDe/Vote_mirroring
>> Start : a mailing list of the Metagovernment project
>> Post to the list: Start at metagovernment.org
>> Manage subscription:
> Start : a mailing list of the Metagovernment project
> Post to the list: Start at metagovernment.org
> Manage subscription:
email: pablo2garcia at gmail.com
skype: pablo2all ; twitter: @pablo2garcia
(mi nuevo proyecto!!)
"PLAN CYBORG" - en RADIO POLITEIA
reuniones&radio sobre herramientas digitales político-sociales
Quieres asistir? difundir, ayudar, documentar? pasarme contactos?
estamos empezando!! (feb 2013)
Info&edit: http://titanpad.com/ovKJvX2M5p (propón y edita los Temas)
http://facebook.com/groups/PlanCyborg - @PlanCyborg
La wikipedia del 15m esta despegando! Nos vendrá bien una
Noticias seleccionadas por la gente: http://meneame.net
Un partido político interesante: http://patidodeinternet.es promueve
More information about the Start