[MG] New open source UI diagrams for a federated, comprehensive govt monitoring tool
mike at zelea.com
Wed May 15 04:03:47 EDT 2013
I missed your original post on LiberationTech.
I'm afraid your image links fail in Firefox 16 and Chrome 25. After
following your first link, the others have no effect; the image stays
the same regardless of the image number in the fragment.
> EveryVote.org’s mission ... 2) to make all EveryVote tools
> federation-compatible with as many other government monitoring tools
> as possible, so that a monopoly over government monitoring tools
> cannot form.
> 1) A tentative name for a collaboration of federation-compatible
> government monitoring tools could be OpenGov Federation
> <http://imgur.com/a/iha6o#8>. #opengovfed
If I load this from scratch, it takes me to a page about Sarah Moore.
Is the Activity Tracker there meant to illustrate how the federation
might work? Like a cross-site news aggregator in this case?
Mitch Downey said:
> Hi Metagov,
> If you've read the LibTech listserv recently you may have already seen this
> message below, but I'm submitting it here as well since Michael has offered
> insights and been supportive of this effort in the past. I also would like
> to share it here because I think metagov is on the same page as we are with
> regard to the importance of the successful federation of government
> monitoring tools to avert a monopoly on them from forming.
> Click this link for the most recent UI diagrams for EVomni:
> (link to this message in blog
> EveryVote.org’s mission is to improve crowd wisdom and government efficacy
> by providing open source (AGPL) tools that 1) allow people to learn about
> and interact with all of their candidates and officials using one
> convenient web page, and 2) to make all EveryVote tools
> federation-compatible with as many other government monitoring tools as
> possible, so that a monopoly over government monitoring tools cannot form.
> Some notes about the UI diagrams:
> 1) A tentative name for a collaboration of federation-compatible government
> monitoring tools could be OpenGov Federation <http://imgur.com/a/iha6o#8>.
> 2) EV News <http://imgur.com/a/iha6o#16> is basically reddit, except users
> can filter upvotes and downvotes based on whether those votes were cast by
> supporters <http://imgur.com/a/iha6o#17>,
> or undecideds <http://imgur.com/a/iha6o#18> on a topic. I can’t wait for
> the day this tool becomes available. I love reddit, but its biggest
> drawback is that it necessarily forms a hivemind that prevents minority
> viewpoints from being heard, so it is not a fair platform for civil
> discourse. EV News would do all the same things as reddit, except minority
> viewpoints could be heard.
> 3) The Consensus Tracker <http://imgur.com/a/iha6o#5> is a way for you to
> learn at-a-glance how everyone you ‘support’ (your trusted advisors) or
> ‘oppose’ (your distrusted advisors) are voting on any site entity
> (candidates, officials, bills, etc.). To our knowledge, no available
> government monitoring tools are using this technology yet. That’s a shame,
> because if a person understands how the Consensus Tracker works, then they
> basically understand how liquid
> democracy<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delegative_democracy>works, and
> can begin participating in it.
> To illustrate, if 7 groups you support have voted on Bill A, and 5 of those
> groups voted to support Bill A, while 2 voted to oppose Bill A, then the
> corresponding box in the Consensus Tracker would display a green +43%.
> Or, if 1 group you support has voted to support Bill A, while 6 groups have
> voted against it, then the corresponding box in the Consensus Tracker would
> display a red -71%.
> Algebraically, if:
> X = # of groups you support that are supporting the bill
> Y = # of groups you support that are opposing the bill
> Then the Consensus among groups you support on the bill = (X - Y)/(X + Y)
> 4) If there was ever an argument that we should consider
> liquid/networked/delegative democracy to support or replace the US current
> representative democracy, I personally think this image speaks
> 5) If you do not think comprehensive US candidate and official databases
> are one of (if not the) highest priority needs in the US today, again please
> take a look at this image <http://i.imgur.com/aWB2UL2.png>.
> Average US voters are responsible for the oversight of well over 50 elected
> representatives, and that does not include the judges (I had to vote on
> over 30 in Nov. 2012). It should not surprise us that the American
> government is not representing the will of the people (Congressional
> approval = 15% <http://www.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx>), nor
> that Americans seem so unwilling to do anything about it. Given our current
> technologies, comprehensive oversight of our elected officials by average
> citizens is completely impractical, so we should expect Americans to be
> cynical yet apathetic about their government.
> Fortunately there are logical steps we must take to change that. Before we
> can expect Americans to become active, well-informed citizens, we need to
> provide them with sufficient government monitoring tools. The first steps
> to making sufficient government monitoring tools is *1* completing the free,
> publicly downloadable comprehensive candidate database, and *2* completing
> the free, publicly downloadable comprehensive official database, so
> independent developers can create comprehensive government monitoring
> tools. EveryVote hopes you will become active, outspoken advocates for
> goals *1* and *2*, if you are not already.
> Since EveryVote is a small, student and volunteer-driven project, our first
> goal is to create an open source app to help university students learn
> about and interact with all of their student government candidates in one
> convenient location (EVmini). A prototype is
> and you can watch a 60 second video intro to the EveryVote Facebook
> app here<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ55iNwx6Ow>.
> If you have any questions or feedback for us, or you may want to help this
> Summer in any capacity (coding, web design, outreach, mentoring, anything),
> we’d really appreciate hearing from you at contactus at everyvote.org, or
> please follow or tweet @EveryVoteOrg <http://www.twitter.com/everyvoteorg>.
> Thanks for reading! Please let us know what you think so you can help this
> project evolve.
> Mitch <http://www.twitter.com/mdowney84>*
More information about the Start