[MG] Terms of ownership for the domain name (p/owdo)
Thomas von der Elbe
ThomasvonderElbe at gmx.de
Sun Jun 27 09:02:26 EDT 2010
Michael Allan wrote:
"The job of the caretakers is to guard the domain name against misuse.
The only feasible means of guarding it (I think) is a veto:
What do you think?"
You want to give the caretakers a veto concerning all issues of domain-ownership. But only during the time before the transfer of the domain to the public. Right?
I imagine this does not sound very trustworthy to the public. They might think: "Ah well, just before we reach the 1000 votes for new ownership-conditions a caretaker comes along and pulls out his veto ...! No, thanks!"
Please describe a case, where such a veto would be of worth for a caretaker. I think, if we find good ownership-conditions, we dont need a veto altogether. The caretakers would just stick to it no matter what.
GMX DSL: Internet-, Telefon- und Handy-Flat ab 19,99 EUR/mtl.
Bis zu 150 EUR Startguthaben inklusive! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
More information about the Start